our science

Because truth is in demonstration.

And only excess of strength is proof of strength.

Of course the fucking thing is deep.
Volcanos beneath the surface like you wouldn't immediately glance.
But what springs out is the necessity of the success due to the will of mankind being only and exclusively directed at what I have in mind
which is what would be the case of the doors of Orn Broken opened to a consistently Orn Broken world.


you could see this a self-valuing wheel with 7 arrows; a choice which offers itself to the world.

It is true that there is a web of tunnels of existence, existence is tunnel like of course due to time and mortality and linearity and stuff.
At the crossroads the symptoms of pale mortality are negated and the excessiveness of the procedure is revealed by recognition of the outward force that I generated by and allows for the process of tunnel-vision, basic life as a sentient will. As constricted as the subjective form is, so recklessly out of bounds is the power that it potentiates. (Hence, Marxisms and all slave-religions bizarre explosiveness); there is no telling where it is going. It is probably even a law that whatever happens it can not be that which has been expected, because of some casino rule or something.

Somehow this has to tie to Archimedes.
The first actual scientist, and a man of uncompromising honour.

The concept of the steam engine is almost fully his credit, and thus so so is the Industrial Age.
Newton in a sense just added to his theory, or refund it so as for it to apply to motion and not merely the abstract notion of pressure-displacement-cauality.

Anyway, the thin is al sciences will come to mix in new ways under the great header.

Party science is of course most easily compared to chemistry.
As is VO.

Self-valuing is chemistry more than it is cold physics, but of course quantum mechanics is chemistry on a deeper level, the area of the cooking that goes on between cause and effect. Chemistry studies the present, the ways and powers in which a present moment can unfold.

Appropriation.
Life is will to power because energy is scarce, energy is scarce because life is will to power.
Fry an egg and know the cosmos. Know yourself and fry the bacon.

What was first, the bacon or the egg?

there are many feelings, subjective emotive experiences of meaning, for which no words exist. i used to try and catalogue them, to eventually write a book or essay on the subject. it’s basically unexplored.

I like how you're not disgusted by the canvas the world is. It gives me a silly kind of hope. Like there's someone out there approaching my intelligence that considers it worth it to get something done.

I'm not a fatalist. I was just born about 400000 years too early.

I met you... right when I had given up hope. Just wanted some philosophy nerds to pine with. There are none. It is true, at least, that you are much further along than any academian.

In an odd fucked up kind of way, that binds me to your service.

Stupid mistakes and all. For, from your perspective, I guess they are not mistakes at all.

I guess the mood swings are on again.

Onto the gritty path then.

Saturn on Jupiter surely forces too many steps back for comfort.
Mistakes Ive made many, because there is no path in which they don't rule.
If the ascent is too quick, mistakes can cost everything.
And when you take over the world, mistakes are literally everywhere.
You need to actually work with them. Eventually there won't be such things as pure mistakes anyone, as a foundational response network has been established. VO is the key to such a network on a general order of things; a more specific thing. Ill call it Orn Broken here, is the key to such a thing in the specific order of us.

As I see it.

What doesn't kill em makes me stronger.
My philosophers heart didn't allow me to give up when you disappeared -
my humanity was sure I was being a fool -
but it turns out the philosopher was right. That is only because he was right about dealing with another philosopher. All the mere humanity around me and in exists to contradict the philosophers "hope"; which is of course not merely a hope, but a sneering test of the bored cosmos.

The beauty I see in the world is a reward, for existing among idiots.
I apparently deserve that reward, and I think Aw Shit deserves an analogous reward; it is the proper reflection of the concept of a world-canvas. No nicer name can apply.

Fuck all poetry in this respect. We go beyond that realm into the true grit.

I know what it is like to float between ones own power.
Saturn likes us first as playthings.

You are the only man I've tested in person that didnt reveal deep emotional cowardice. Yeah you have deep emotional ... whatevers, I wont insult you or myself by trying to define it from the outside, but no cowardice. Somehow I absolutely lack that as well. This adds up to a simple lack of the true  boredom that governs the not-so-well-turned-out.

After all cowardice is the most boring thing of them all.
Cowardice is the wisdom of the nameless.

Of course I know you are often bored. But not with yourself. Boredom with oneself is the root of malice.

Cowardice - boredom - malice - cowardice
That's the cycle of the shithe.

Fuck you.

Did a genie ever say "fuck you" to you before? Lol.

Brace yourself.

cause every time i wrote a rhyme
these ppl think it’s a crime to tell em
what’s on my mind
i guess i’m a criminal

Crime don't foster anger
Only vengeance
It's meant to preempt it
Superiority might get 'em mad
But I find that sad
Lad
I'd prefer a bet or an actual challenge
Meanwhile lettem fume, I got the chalice

im not superior
i don’t hear ya
all goddamn luck
ain’t give no fuck
and i don’t think
cause i drink

Oh right, the party science.

I still am serious in that this is the only way to get mankind off its ass and shake up its nervous system so as to arrange for a very loose collective one, from which a naturally enforced earthly ethics can arise.

Only through sweat will philosophy have its impact on the lower castes.

This seemed like a fun place to put this.

"Any finite volume of space regardless of how small contains an infinite quantity of energy, since the number of such units or volumes contained in the known universe is finite."

This blew my mind. Because the universe itself is infinite, or rather reality itself is infinite by logical principle since 'to be limited' would make no sense because "everything" cannot be limited by something or else it is not "everything". What could limit everything? What could be outside of everything, how would it make sense for there to be an ultimate limit or edge to existence itself?

Since existence is infinite, it follows that any finite volume or unit of existence is also infinite, or we can say contains infinite energy. That is because if you take an infinity and divide it by finite numbers you still get infinity; it is also because, logically, you cannot add up a quantity of finite things and arrive at infinity. You need an infinite progression, a line that never ends. So if you were to break up the universe or existence into discrete units or volumes, each one finite in dimensions, it follows that those units or volumes actually contain infinite energy or even infinite universes and existences within them. This also conforms to hermetic principles, as above so below for example.

Another interesting point I read is that as you subdivide something its motion or energy increases. For example, an atom; the total atom is more static relative to its constituent parts, namely there is more motion and activity at the subatomic level than there is at the atomic level. This supposedly holds for everything and all levels, that if you subdivide that thing you will find increase in motion and energy/activity. This seems to make a lot of sense, if I were to look inside my body right now I would find lots of motion and activity going on, yet I am just sitting here. So I theorize that "stasis" or being beyond time (time being a principle here, we can get into fields later) is a consequence of macro scale increase. What is macro scale or size increase? It is a mathematical progression, such as 2 4 8 16 etc. It is building upon what exists in order to make something that exists in a larger way, but which still bears relations to that smaller dimension from which it came.

Mathematically we have infinite progressions and infinite regressions. Both work in sync. As you move downward in scale, you are decreasing the time component thus concentrating motion and energy/activity into smaller relative spaces, causing them to increase, while this represents an infinite regression in size and an infinite progression in available energy/activity; in the opposite manner, as you move upward in scale you increase the time component thus loosening motion and energy/activity into larger relative spaces, causing them to decrease, and this represents an infinite progression in size and a corresponding infinite regression in available energy/activity.

Shit.

Tesla said the same, that there is infinite energy in every little quantity of existence. Logically and mathematically this makes good sense. Tesla and Einstein both worked on the Philadelphia Experiment together. So did John von Neumann, the genius mathematics. And Einstein supposedly unified all the physical fields into perfect UFT, but was convinced not to publish it. So then the government just took the information. That also seems to make sense, we know the government also took Tesla's research and that von Neumann was basically an agent of the government anyway despite, as I can tell, maintaining his civilian status.

The other strange aspect is the bloch wall or 'domain' inside a magnet, which is difficult to find information about. The iron filings test that shows the magnetic field lines is false, because each individual iron filing is magnetizing as it falls into the pattern; in reality the spin of the electrons at either pole are opposite and begin to converge as one moves toward the middle of the magnet, at the very middle they do converge, therefore the magnetic field is cancelled at that point. This is what it looks like:



Here is what the electrons do in terms of their spin, from one pole to the other, as you move to the middle of the magnet:



That is not a common image you will find when you look this shit up. Even most physics texts and websites do not talk about this. They still talk about the typical iron filings fields that spread out from one pole to the other.

We should test some of these ideas. I want to create counter-rotating electric and magnetic fields and align these in mathematical ratios of rotations per second, to see what happens. Supposedly this is the key to not only control over gravity but also over time. Gravity being a field effect, time too, and not just some Newtonian attraction between masses that cannot really be explained. Gravity, time, electricity, magnetism... all fields and all bound up within each other somehow. We gotta break this shit down, man.  


Additional note, this post was fueled by some nice imported beer from Holland.

"ABSTRACT
Bloch lines are boundaries between regions of a magnetic domain wall with opposite chiralities. An electric current exerts a force on Bloch lines through the s‐d exchange interaction, in metallic ferromagnets. This large ‘‘s‐d gyroscopic force’’ is normal to the drift velocity ve of the electron gas and to the Bloch line itself. We consider a current crossing a plane domain wall which contains Bloch lines, all of the same sense of twist. At a critical value of ‖ve‖, the Bloch lines start to move along the wall. At a larger critical value, the wall itself starts to move, in the direction of ve. This should happen at current densities ≂106 A/cm2, for Bloch walls in Ni‐Fe films. The effective viscous coupling between electron gas and a Bloch wall is ≂100 times larger than the coupling arising from s‐d exchange in the absence of Bloch lines. Small magnetic bubble domains move at right angle to the direction of a uniform current."

Yeah I read about this too, you can actually move these walls around inside the magnets. Fucking crazy.

Magnetism is very interesting. Somehow as electron spins align with each other this produces a field effect. Somehow the mere fact that electrons separated from each other happen to be spinning in the same direction and doing so in straight lines means that weird distance effects are created. This seems like a kind of value interaction, an isometric emergence at an almost mental level, like a mind drawing connections between things to be equally valued just because the mind perceives them as being similar in value, so that a distance effect or larger scale of reality effect is created even though those things themselves, the individual electrons in this case, dont actually interact with each other... the similarity is at the valuing level.

The other idea is that the electron spin is actually spinning the ether. SO when you have many electrons all spinning in the same way this churns up the ether into larger patterns which creates concentrated effects, like magnifying the ether into waves or pulses that impact upon other things. I like this explanation because I think ether makes a lot of sense, and is logically undeniable to exist somehow. But the 'units' of ether would be so small that we could simply not measure them. That is because to us the ether is just space itself, reality itself, and thus perfectly uniform and far-removed from us, like we were staring at water and without the aid of any technology we would never be able to see how that water is broken up into discrete molecules. I think it must be the same with the ether. It is just the unified field, probably. All of the fields we observe and work with, time, gravity, electric, magnetic, all of these are manifest macro scale effects of changes and patterns produced at the level of the ether. And as tectonics would dictate, the ether is just a threshold removed from us plane or tectonic plate that is possible to interact with us only as "one thing" totally indivisible or not to interact with us at all, namely to interact secondarily through these emergent effects like the physical forces we experience.

So subatomic and quantum physics is on the right track because it is breaking down this unified nature of our experience of the ether threshold tectonic plane, but quantum physics needs to be guided by some philosophy here in order to understand what it is doing and not keep falsely assuming itself to be some kind of god or end in itself. Statistical graphs of probabilities are not reality, they only represent our as-yet inability to understand the causes at that smaller level. But at the quantum level we are actually beginning to break into the ether itself. Thus we should start to be able to actually see how a spinning electron in a magnet is churning up the ether into waves. Those waves are what we call magnetism, Im quite sure.

And what if you curved the material so that the electrons spins remained aligned but the electrons were in curves or other patterns instead of straight lines?

How indeed can a man know that hes psychic.





so anyway there is a great aa, this, is great.r


anyway you wanted to talk to me, I mean you, ante dot listen... hard to when I said, you know,
submachine thinking.
-what is thus, submachine thinking, my dear young boy?

Im not dear and young, but im boy alright.

But what, boy, is submachine thinking.

*boy nods*

that




questions shall be your answers, just as thirst shall be your fulfillment.