The Analytic Impossibility of Globalism Until Value Ontology Is Implemented as All-Law (2)

Fiction could never approach the perversity and absurdity of the actual persons involved.
and millions upon millions of them.

I must have misclicked somewhere as I suddenly had a huffington pst open and.... saw truly, the most devastatingly stupid thing Ive ever seen this week.







More than stupid even it is desperate. Nothing could indicate defeat more clearly than to push such already transparent tactics to such a pathetic extreme.
It seriously debases anyone who accepts it as a valid sort of human communication.

What kind of pressure is this publisher under? i can sooner fathom creating something out of nothing or flying by my own devices than making something as stupid as that.

Sane people are at a loss when they try to analyze an idiot.

It's hard telling if they were actually trying to say something or they had nothing else to say so they made up some stuff.

I'm sure there is some actual news they could have reported.

Lol.

"If you have enemies that means you're doing something right." --anonymous

Yes but just the fucking weakness of it.

Look at the title, then the picture, and then the subtext which is the actual content and on several levels entirely obliterates the title....

like

CLINTON IS TERRIFIC

insert picture

....ALLY HORRIBLE.





that doesnt even cover it.


The insane stupidity of the article is marked by the fact that it presumes that, on the matter of the US President, anyone would want to know what Canadians think.
And then its only 42 percent...!

Truly the weakest attempt at anything Ive seen in a while.

If the Democrats keep digging they are going to end up putting Clinton in jail.

One must know when to stop.

"JUNE 20--A judge yesterday approved a Texas man’s request to change his name from Ernesto Baeza Acosta to ErnestoTrump, records show.

In a District Court petitionfiled earlier this month, Acosta wrote that, “I want to use my new name because it is more suitable for professional purposes.”

Acosta, 34, is an Odessa resident who was born in Houston, according to a court filing that lists his race as “Hispanic.” Seen at right, Acosta paid a $272 filing fee to become the country’s newest Trump.

In an interview today, Trump said that his parents were born in Mexico and entered the U.S. illegally more than 40 years ago. Noting that both his parents have green cards, Trump added that his mother, who is not a fan of the president, was upset about his name change."

Dropping the "o" on Ernesto might have helped too.

Ernest Trump.

The fact that the "Russia collusion" fiction is completely bipartisan and has actually managed to force Trump to impose sanctions on Moscow indicates the US is simply continuing on its path to military world hegemony, a monadic power.

Very clearly the Temple Mount, and Russian support for everything anti-Israeli is increasingly an issue.

Ive written on this board, I guess since 2011, but with greater intensity after Trumps election, that the Israelis will be focussed now on regaining their Temple Mount. We can see the struggles that are being called about now, with the metal detectors etcetera, as the beginning of the process of annexation, not unlike the Russian strategy in Crimea entirely. But of course, with many other aspects. Just the sentiment of it is the same: what, we're here? Oh, wait, thats right. Well we were here before you, so....

Perhaps we will see open war. Here's a quick review of what happened the last time a couple of nations successfully called for violence against Israel.



I bet the technological difference is even more significant now. Part of the IDF must be aching for the war to finally break out. Unrest on the Temple Mount can be interpreted as an omen.

Russia s support of Iran through thick and thin has cost them, they may actually have fallen into a trap with that, as the Revolutionary Regime there was never going to be able to build a stable state of affairs, I spoke to an Iranian here who told me that the stories about the Shah and the war against him were a fiction spun by the west - which is interesting since Ben Affleck made that movie where he laid out the whole narrative as it is supposed to be controversial - of course bells were going off when a supposedly controversial and antiAmerican reading of affairs was put in a movie that was given the Oscar. It occurred to me then that the CIA may actually want Khomeini and his followers to lead Iran, precisely because they are such morons. For Russia to be stuck in a deal where they have to back these morons in supposed defiance of the Imperialist West is a pretty good joke. I can see how this in part be real.

Jimmy Carter must hold the blame for Iran.

And by way of thanking Carter for destroying a stable government the Iranians took out embassy employees and other Americans prisoner.

Where's Alexander The Great when you need him the most?

Thats the right question.

Despite being opposed by the entire world and his entire deep state government, he pulls off keeping by far the most important promise he made.



Thank you mr Trump.

Yes, that was great news for him and the USA.

Yes, at the height of Obama's "economic recovery" the economy was praised for adding 200,000 jobs a month, and this was during the height of QE. Now that QE has been over for a few years now, we are back to that same level and actually surpassing it, under Trump.


It just goes to show that this,



is obviously superior to this,

Trump creates jobs for free, because we didn't have to pour debt into the economy to "create" those jobs, they simply materialized as a consequence of more logical policies and freedoms manifesting in the economic situation as a whole, including an increase of optimism and future-valuing.


In contrast, this is how leftists and neoliberals make jobs:

"Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job
The stimulus is now causing the economy to shed jobs."
http://www.weeklystandard.com/obamas-economists-stimulus-has-cost-278000-per-job/article/576014

"The new excuse was that another QE was necessary in order to reduce unemployment rates and get a job recovery underway. In September 2012 the Fed announced it would launch another QE, printing and injecting $85 billion a month into the economy, until such time as the ‘U-3’ unemployment rate fell—from the 8.1% level in September 2012 to a 6.5% target level. The U-3 rate has come down over the past year to 7.3%. Meanwhile, the more accurate U-6 unemployment rate still remains around 14% and more than 20 million continue unemployed."
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/18989-the-federal-reserve-qe-and-jobs


Lol.

Yeah, we should always beware when the government says its going to fix something.

Sisyphus wrote:

Yeah, we should always beware when the government says its going to fix something.

Yep, when painting a street crossing costs $68,000 you have to worry for the future of your civilization.

Good point. I have never done the research but I would be willing to bet that work done by any government averages three times more costly than the same work would cost in a free market economy.

Try 300 times.

I was trying to be nice.

So was I.

Thrasymachus wrote:

Trump creates jobs for free, because we didn't have to pour debt into the economy to "create" those jobs, they simply materialized as a consequence of more logical policies and freedoms manifesting in the economic situation as a whole, including an increase of optimism and future-valuing.


In contrast, this is how leftists and neoliberals make jobs:

"Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job
The stimulus is now causing the economy to shed jobs."
http://www.weeklystandard.com/obamas-economists-stimulus-has-cost-278000-per-job/article/576014

Obama is the dumbest person ever.

Haha yes, "let's create jobs by dumping debt into the economy, so that every new job costs an average of $280,000 of tax money to create, but only pays an average of $45,000. Obviously the difference is just necessary and acceptable administrative cost!"

Fixed Cross wrote:

Obama is the dumbest person ever.

I don't know about the dumbest person ever but it is my opinion that he was the worst president we have had during my lifetime.

Sisyphus wrote:

Fixed Cross wrote:

Obama is the dumbest person ever.

I don't know about the dumbest person ever but it is my opinion that he was the worst president we have had during my lifetime.

I mean he had to be president to effectively be this dumb:

Thrasy wrote:

"let's create jobs by dumping debt into the economy, so that every new job costs an average of $280,000 of tax money to create, but only pays an average of $45,000. Obviously the difference is just necessary and acceptable administrative cost!"

A mere citizen won't get the opportunity to be nearly this dumb. So I can't abandon my appraisal of Obama as the dumbest person that ever lived. He is just really ambitious about being a moron. A fanatic, one might say.

I have no desire to argue against what you have said.

There are some hiding under rocks who still believe he was a good president. They come out only at night.