Before The Light
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


'Mortal as I am, I know that I am born for a day. But when I follow at my pleasure the serried multitude of the stars in their circular course, my feet no longer touch the earth.'
 
HomeSearchRegisterLog in

 

 Derrida

Go down 
AuthorMessage
individualized
Tower
Tower
individualized

Posts : 5737
: 6982
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : The Stars

Derrida Empty
PostSubject: Derrida   Derrida Icon_minitimeSat Apr 29, 2017 4:56 pm

Reading through an essay by Derrida. Some thoughts so far:

1- He operates on the assumption that the greatest depth is the most radical and absolute openness to the Other, to otherness as such. In so far as it is impossible to be "absolutely open to otherness as such" he concludes that not only is philosophy a doomed project but humanity itself is doomed.

2- He follows Levinas apparently in claiming that a philosophy which is "enveloped in its own fundamental conceptions" is a "fantasy" and "a contradiction" that he lays at the feet of the "contradiction" of "formal logic".

3- He traces philosophy back to the Greeks, and proclaims all thought since Greece to be inherently Greek; he does this not in praise of this thought or tradition but rather to bemoan the fact of it, that it has closed us off from radical absolute openness to the Other, and has allowed us to forget the ultimate category of "experience itself"; "Experience itself and that which is most irreducible within experience: the passage and departure toward the other; the other itself as what is most irreducibly other within it: Others."

4- Theorizing (which he uses to include all thought which is not part of his project of a supposed radical absolute openness to otherness as such) is considered "imperial" and unable to shake the "last naivete" of conceiving of "Being as an object".

5- Logos itself is apparently just an arbitrary distinction made between "inside-outside" and "interior-exterior"; "...it is a question simply of revealing beneath this truth, as that which founds it and is dissimulated within it, "a situation which precedes the division of Being into an inside and an outside." However it is also a question of inaugurating, in a way that is to be new, quite new, a metaphysics of radical separation and exteriority."


Yeah. That is about all I can stomach for now.

 

___________
“Be clever, Ariadne! ...
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? ...
I am your labyrinth ...”.  -N

“A man is not great if he is not small, and he is not small if he is not great. Concepts flirt with the loss of their significance in the oscillation between ambiguous states, and this is in part the function and purpose of concepts.” -Primer on Meaning


Last edited by Thrasymachus on Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:59 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
individualized
Tower
Tower
individualized

Posts : 5737
: 6982
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : The Stars

Derrida Empty
PostSubject: Re: Derrida   Derrida Icon_minitimeSat Apr 29, 2017 4:58 pm

The essay in question is called Violence and Metaphysics, chapter 4 in the book Writing and Difference. If I can find a copy of the essay online I will link or paste it here, but so far I have not been able to find one.

 

___________
“Be clever, Ariadne! ...
You have little ears; you have my ears:
Put a clever word in them! —
Must one not first hate oneself, in order to love oneself? ...
I am your labyrinth ...”.  -N

“A man is not great if he is not small, and he is not small if he is not great. Concepts flirt with the loss of their significance in the oscillation between ambiguous states, and this is in part the function and purpose of concepts.” -Primer on Meaning
Back to top Go down
 
Derrida
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Before The Light :: Sap :: Interpretation-
Jump to: