A corporate news Mad Lib

"[insert corporate media company] has learned that some expert [insert plural job title] say that [insert noun] may have [insert past-tense verb] [insert preposition] [insert political figure], and that it seems as if [same noun] and [same political figure] could possibly be [insert verb] in order to [insert hyperbolic fear]. Unnamed sources believe that [same political figure] may have also [insert past-tense verb] with the [insert foreign government], while [same noun] has so far not denied any connection to the [same foreign government] and is also accused of [insert above verb present tense]."

Let's see how well it works:


"CNN has learned that some expert financial consultants say that a cat may have slept alongside Judge Roy Moore, and that it seems as if the cat and Judge Roy Moore could possibly be swimming in order to initiate nuclear war. Unnamed sources believe that Judge Roy Moore may have also played with the Russian government, while the cat has so far not denied any connection to the Russian government and is also accused of playing."


Yep, seems accurate to me.

"The Washington Post has learned that some expert plumbers say that Texas may have spied for Trump, and that it seems as if Texas and Trump could possibly be colluding in order to rob all of the world's gold. Unnamed sources believe that Trump may have also spoken with the North Korean government, while Texas has so far not denied any connection to the North Korean government and is also accused of speaking."

"Fox News has learned that some expert computer designers say that a potted plant may have climbed with Rand Paul, and that it seems as if the potted plant and Rand Paul could possibly be hugging in order to blow up the moon. Unnamed sources believe that Rand Paul may have also written with the Chinese government, while the potted plant has so far not denied any connection to the Chinese government and is also accused of writing."

I'm not sure about Rand Paul. I've not seen him as being very useful in helping Trump with the agenda to Make America Great Again.

Why, what did he do besides stand in the way of the healthcare bill?

That was probably useful.

I just read this:

Quote :

Obamacare used family income, local cost of health insurance, age and smoking status to determine financial aid.
The new plan championed by President Donald Trump bases tax credits primarily on age, which begins phasing out for individuals who earn more than $75,000 per year ($150,000 for a married couple).

Thats great. Obama care was fasci beyond nazi, this is just rational and humane.

enemies of Trump are SATANs fuckin little satans. But Trumps serious adversaries are his business partners.

I think Paul is also tilting the tax break in favor of the wealthy.

I had and still have two major issues with Obamacare:

1. It causes inflation of all health services in the USA

2. It requires individuals to buy something off America's Free Market system and authorizes IRS (which operates without rules) to penalize those who choose to not participate. (Very anti-Anarchist!!)