women who like trump despite the access hollywood comments

the internet and especially youtube is being scrubbed of anyone talking about why they like trump, except for clips from MSM.

so i need help finding women who talk about why they don’t care that trump said some vulgar things about women and is kind of a womanizer. many women like him anyway. so i want to hear it from their own mouth, let me know if you know of any women who talk about this. it’s important as something to show left-leaning people who act like no woman ever could support trump just because of his comments on the access hollywood tape.

It's so far removed from reason that I don't wish to directly engage. Everyone knows porn industry is all left. Case closed. The left is all and only about "sexual liberation" but also wants to be about pretending this doesn't have any consequences.  I do think of all avid leftist as literally rapists. As I am 100 percent certain anyone who thinks like that dude you talked to is criminally deranged in a sexual way. I just would like for these people to all die. I can't be communicating with them or thinking of how to put reason in them - they are rapists after all. No non-rapist would twist facts of sexual abuse so aggresaively. I'm certain this dude you mention has already acted in deeply demeaning or even criminal ways.  It is  very evidently a mask that they're so afraid of losing they become schizofrenically convinced it is true. You can't allow such evil to be the interrogating side.  It has to be the side in question.  His equivocation womanising with rape is proof he is completely depraved and insane. He should be chemically castrated for that view. Tell him that.

Could be I'm exaggerating but i take such things as excuse-creating, calling a womaniser a rapist is as good as calling a rapist a womanizer. Which they can then self-apply.

he goes into these hyper-semantic detailed elaborations about “well they way he said this, and in context, and...” all to try and get from “i like to kiss women, i don’t even wait” to “i kiss women right away without asking and i don’t care if they want me to or not” which then is supposed to imply “i like to rape women”.

that’s literally his thought-process.

i mean i get it, trump said some vulgar stuff. it’s demeaning to women to grab them down there, if you just walk up to a woman and grab her down there out of the blue then that would be sexual assault. but trumps not talking about that, the CONTEXT and meaning of what he is saying is that they will let you, they like it or want it, they crave male affection and even more if the man is rich. that’s not just on men but with “power” and hierarchy but it’s also on women. he is talking about the chemistry and nonverbal attraction that doesn’t stop to ask for a signed contract in order to kiss. this is deep in our dna. and some of it is sick and based on using others rather than valuing them as who they are, and yes trump is a womanizer, and vulgar at times. but that doesn’t make him a criminal nor hitler. it doesn’t make his ideas invalid or his supporters idiots.

show me a prominent leftist politician or hollywood or media elite who isn’t a womanizer. i’m sure many of them are actually rapists. JFK and Bill Clinton were well known womanizers but that doesnt seem to bother the left.

Il never want to talk in these terms, as if nature should be prosecuted for bringing us forth. That guy is a walking dead, avoid such rot.

Clinton is, I think, an actual rapist, certainly his wife has thousands of child rapes on her conscience.

So the notion that a Trump supporter could be placed on the defence in sexual issues is just completely INSANE to me. Anyone who opposed Trump vs Hillary is guilty of attempted mass rape. Thats the bottom line for me and the only way I ever talk to a liberal. "Are you aware of the torture you are responsible for taking this stance?" and Ill proceed explaining. That seems to help.

yes, but often i find that people on the left quickly shut their eyes and ears to such things, they do not want to be exposed to those ideas. ideas like what the clintons may have done to so many thousands of children. it is possible to write such things off as "conspiracy theories", of course, and keep going with one's life as if everything is just fine and none of that sort of thing goes on, as if there is not a crisis of pedophilia in super-leftist hollyweird, for example.

we would need to come armed with sheets and sheets of facts already written down and ready to talk about, in order to have any hope of convincing these people, because they always put the burden of proof on us while leaving none on themselves. that is part of the game and why it is so infuriating to talk to them and try to have an honest discussion, because they sit there saying anything they want with no assumption of need for any kind of proof or evidence whatsoever, but they will hound you on every single point for a dozen facts and citations to back up what you are saying.

then if you put them in the same position and ask for evidence and citations they inevitably come back with a wall street journal or new york times articles they pulled up using gulag. because they implicitly trust the corporate media they are just plugging into that matrix as that one guy said, so they have this direct feed on "truth" and "evidence" and they don't really think they need to actually demonstrate it, they know it is there. and likewise for us, we have seen and read so much over the years that we too have accumulated our own trusted repository of facts, things we believe to be true that we might not be able to pull out a list of  a dozen citations and references to demonstrate. but that is the thing about thinking, it doesn't really work like an academic journal paper. we absorb things we are exposed to over time and we process them and work through them and come to conclusions, and many of the intermediary steps are forgotten, and rightly so.

ah, so that is it... the left is slowly replacing their own thinking capacity with simply plugging into the matrix, downloading what they see on corporate TV news. for the left, they too forget a lot of the intermediary steps, because what they are doing is simulating the act of thinking, except they aren't actually thinking... they are allowing someone else to insert contents directly into their minds and then also provide an overarching narrative to link those contents together, all to simulate the thought-process.

wow.

Capable wrote:

yes, but often i find that people on the left quickly shut their eyes and ears to such things, they do not want to be exposed to those ideas. ideas like what the clintons may have done to so many thousands of children. it is possible to write such things off as "conspiracy theories", of course, and keep going with one's life as if everything is just fine and none of that sort of thing goes on, as if there is not a crisis of pedophilia in super-leftist hollyweird, for example.

This was the universal excuse the Germans gave about Auschwitz, it is the most famous German phase, "wir haven es nicht gewusst." "We didn't know".
I call such deliberate ignorance pure evil.

Quote :

we would need to come armed with sheets and sheets of facts already written down and ready to talk about, in order to have any hope of convincing these people, because they always put the burden of proof on us while leaving none on themselves. that is part of the game and why it is so infuriating to talk to them and try to have an honest discussion, because they sit there saying anything they want with no assumption of need for any kind of proof or evidence whatsoever, but they will hound you on every single point for a dozen facts and citations to back up what you are saying.

Im aways armed with all the facts, and this is how I have cured a good number of liberals, liberated them from this sickness. It generally causes a lot of tears and pain on both sides. Its really, really hard work to save someone who is heading for the pit of hell. It requires showing them a lot of very harsh facts.

Quote :

then if you put them in the same position and ask for evidence and citations they inevitably come back with a wall street journal or new york times articles they pulled up using gulag. because they implicitly trust the corporate media they are just plugging into that matrix as that one guy said, so they have this direct feed on "truth" and "evidence" and they don't really think they need to actually demonstrate it, they know it is there. and likewise for us, we have seen and read so much over the years that we too have accumulated our own trusted repository of facts, things we believe to be true that we might not be able to pull out a list of  a dozen citations and references to demonstrate. but that is the thing about thinking, it doesn't really work like an academic journal paper. we absorb things we are exposed to over time and we process them and work through them and come to conclusions, and many of the intermediary steps are forgotten, and rightly so.

Yes, it take a lot to deal with their defence mechanisms. I have healed the most important people in my life, but I also cured a more distant person who regardlessly went on to show abusive behaviour to me, completely unaware of it. He thinks of himself as a sensitive person like the typical leftist, but he is just an abuser, it is deep in him, like it is deep in most such champions of the rhetoric of "sensitivity".

Nazis were real too. These scumbags are just as real and even eviler.

Quote :

ah, so that is it... the left is slowly replacing their own thinking capacity with simply plugging into the matrix, downloading what they see on corporate TV news. for the left, they too forget a lot of the intermediary steps, because what they are doing is simulating the act of thinking, except they aren't actually thinking... they are allowing someone else to insert contents directly into their minds and then also provide an overarching narrative to link those contents together, all to simulate the thought-process.

wow.

Capacity for thinking was always a high privilege. It first of all requires an intellectual conscience, the taste for consistency. I think maybe one in a thousand humans has that. What a typical leftist (or rightist) calls thinking is indeed just repeating phrases.

I have never met a leftist person who could make a basic logical argument. Baffling as it seems even to me, its true. They tend to already err at the first juncture, the first opportunity for deduction.

So they neither think, nor feel.
That seems about right.

They don't actually exist.
This is why you cant reason with them.

They have no sentient self-valuing integrity of their own. They are only flat, tangent functions of the will to destroy all thought and feeling, all identification with truth.