Some Distinctions between Valuer, Valuing and Valued

Who we value as valuer values despite this valuing, and depends on valueds valued by us. The valued determines the valuer's relationship with valuing. This self-referentiality is the will only willing will, and power is the relationship between will's action (valuing) and its existence.

As a side note, I refer to that existence as Chaos. Valuing it so, as a living thing which is unpredictable, which feeds me even as I act with no knowledge of it only if I will accordingly, decreases my waste of thought by several orders of magnitude.

"The valued determines the valuer's relationship with valuing."

Yes indeed, this is the whole conundrum of life, the extreme resilience of imperfection - the question of Hod in the Kabbalah -

patterns of justification, yes, but where did this pattern start?
What options does it close off?

"As a side note, I refer to that existence as Chaos. Valuing it so, as a living thing which is unpredictable, which feeds me even as I act with no knowledge of it only if I will accordingly, decreases my waste of thought by several orders of magnitude."

a problem is that that in itself is orderly.

You're addressing chaos from an orderly, logical idea about it.

Can that work?

"The valued determines the valuer's relationship with valuing. This self-referentiality is the will only willing will"

This is very interesting.