I agree with this, physical reality is a very low standard of existence and "what is real", physical-materiality is only the easiest possible such standard. But all this physical stuff is only a very low emanation of ideal-logical relations, or maybe "meta-logical" we might say. Parodites insight that we can replace a concept of identity for a concept of brute physicality in our standard for "what is real" is very useful, recapitulating Plato and a more true philosophical aspiration than all the mere technics of lower-threshold recognitions.
Language enabled us to form bridges upward to more significant realities; conception abstracts more universal truths as facts and as ideas, ideation is always-already rooted essentially in a kind of factuality. To lie about the merely undeniably physical world around us would represent an early and noble stage in the development of consciousness; human consciousness signifies various points along that more universal developmental continuum, and our subjectivity is eminently rooted in our linguistic capacity, in our enculturation to the history of thought, emotions, values, myths, that entire cultural edifice being a ground through which more universal logic can achieve living realization.
"The runic eye dances between the world and the word", yes I see this as the world-daemon by whose higher triadicity and irresolvable daemonic manifestations man and world are dually brought together, in part, never in total. A dance... I like that image.