The Analytic Impossibility of Globalism Until Value Ontology Is Implemented as All-Law (2)

I dont think thats metaphysical eternity Maximus means but just the consequences that reverberate into the fabric of the whole future-past web; the proof is in the pudding, not in the recipe; things actually work when you approach them rationally, through the intuition of self-valuing logic and the required heart and shrewdness that logic requires to push the cook through the hazard zone and master (wed) chaos and this is seen by all the eyes in the world. If the Democrats managed to throw a wrench in the wheel this will cause so much friction that very interesting things are bound to happen regardless. The next elections ...I can't even fathom what the hell that could be. Its like ten universes of time compressed in two years. And thats still four years before the whole Kanye Aquarius West presidency fantasy takes pace. Lol. I mean KKE

So the fed is raising the interest rate again, to 2.5p percent range, where in Europe we still have virtually no, no or negative interest.
I figure money only actually exist, self-values, in an environment with an interest rate.
Why this commandment against "usury" in some religions effectively prevents any kind of economic dynamic.

Whats worst about the ford "testimony" is that it compromises the power of the justice system to address real future rapes.

Not coincidentally all the porn and rape-hiphop industry is leftist of orientation.

Yes, even if she is telling the truth and even if what she is saying is true, this really does damage to future true cases.

Innocent until proven guilty used to mean something. In a civilized society anyway.

Still, I do not find her story unconvincing. If I were voting on this confirmation I might say something like, "I find her story and the way she tells it to be convincing, I think she is probably telling the truth. Maybe this really did happen to her the way she tells it. And if that is so, then I am truly sorry and feel terribly that she went through this. But I am still voting for him anyway, because this is not up to my personal feelings. I could easily be manipulated by an actress as a real authentic human being, and I am in no position to know which is the case here, and even regardless of that, we have this little thing in the United States called innocence until proven guilty."

Her I can't judge yet, but the democrat pathos is all fake, they all lie so very convincingly maybe a kind hypnosis, where they have been made to believe certain catch phrases about humanity which they get a fix out of but at every juncture of thought there comes out the snarling monster of hateful self-ignorance. Im not saying at all thats the case with her but it is with every one of the Dems who now seem so empathic and thoughtful. They are really extraordinary hypocrites, the best in the game. Trump knows this and knows more than I do so Ill just see where it all lands.

yes the democrat empathy is fake and for political reasons. but i see a lot of fake outrage on the right and a lot of fake believing in kavanaugh’s wonderful character and innocence and that whole fake performance and indirect lying testimony he gave. anyone who watched him would be led to think he is lying and covering something up and being very misleading and putting on a performance of how angry he is. it doesn’t seem like genuine anger to me. maybe it is, but in any case he is lying about small things like “i never once in my life drank so much i couldn’t remember things later”. everyone has done that especially someone who drinks as much as him and he had a reputation for it. he also lied about the meaning of things he is on record saying in his past.

and i do tend to believe Ford, i think she got caught up in the evil democrat games, they used her and she didn’t even want to be named. also the republicans are pushing this lie about how she waited until the end of the process but she reported her allegation before he was even selected. he was just on a list of possible choices and she still reported it about him, she didn’t wait to see who would be picked.

i think she is probably telling the truth, and deserves to be heard and there should be some kind of investigation and trump should probably pick a new nominee. i would not have thought this before i actually saw both ford and kavanaugh testify, but now that i have i’m fairly certain he did these things she said he did. maybe not, it could be a con, and i doubt he could be accused in court if there isn’t more evidence brought forward, but based on her testimony and things from his own past and the fact that he clearly is lying about them AND the fact that he is obviously highly politically biased, which judges shouldn’t be, at least not outwardly because now in the future he can be accused of being not impartial and his decisions can potentially be called into question... yeah just fucking pull him off and find someone else. plus he seems crazy to me. but yeah the democrats are also crazy, it’s just one big crazy shitshow with each side making the other side worse. trump is the level head here, at least he ought to be. also Ford is a level head here too, which is why i expected trump to not attack her because he can realize the difference between her and kavanaugh.

maybe he just doesn’t want to back down. i understand that, but he is going to damage his support among his own supporters by not being honest about how believable and genuine and sane Ford seems when compared to kavanaugh.

Trump ‘s entire appeal is that he speaks from reality. as soon as he stops doing that, for any reason, we are in trouble.

Trump is doing the right thing ordering that further probe. It also gives him some time to reconsider.

I do get the sense Ford is decent, she acts like she's being honest.
But all the people in the hearing on her side are clearly pathological liars, very evil people. It does all smell like the Soviet Union.

Trump said he found her testimony very compelling and that she looked like a very fine woman.



I like how he talks about this in this video.

However Im not convinced Kavanaugh wouldn't be an asset in the war against Marx.
Epecially after I read this on ILP in response to my criticism of a highly biased Breitbart piece.

http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=194348#p2710036

mr reasonable wrote:

I think it's interesting that Kavanaugh worked so hard with Ken Starr to impeach Clinton for lying about a blowjob, but now holds a view of executive power that sees it as significantly more expansive than most people in the legal world would hold. In his days working for Starr, lying about a blowjob was impeachable. But now he thinks that the president should basically be above the law. I could care less about whether or not he dry humped a girl in high school. I'm concerned that he's a political extremist seeking a lifetime nomination to a position that requires one to make decisions independent of politics. If a guy says he's got a logical method of legal interpretation...say he's a textualist or an originalist or a this or that, and that that's the way he decides cases, then that's great. Now if you go back and read his decisions on 100s of cases as to be sure you've got an adequate sample and you find that 90 percent of the time his decisions are leaning in one direction politically, then you should find that as a reason to take pause.

I explained it like this to someone the other day. Let's say you run a restaurant, and at the end of each shift you collect money from waiters and you always round up or down to the nearest dollar when cashing them out. Maybe today you end up 5 bucks short because most of them were rounded one way, and then tomorrow you should end up a few bucks over because it's rounding the other way. But, because you're applying the same principle equally every day, over time you should be relatively even on the money because half the time it should round up and the other half the time it rounds down. SO...if you just keep checking your account and every day it's 5 short, and the manager keeps telling you it's the rounding, and a year goes by and you've been 5 short each day and he keeps telling you it's the rounding, then you know he's full of shit because it should be over as often as it is short over a long enough period of time.

People don't understand shit like this. It doesn't matter if the guy dry humped a girl 20 years ago. What matters is that he thinks American's gun rights are too restrictive. They're not. He thinks that the president should be above the law in more circumstances than almost any one else thinks he should. He shouldn't. He thinks that Christians are under attack and that religious, "rights" ought be given credence to the extent that they, in the view of many might encroach on the rights of others. He thinks that there are times where a person's rights as an individual to do what they want with their body should be interfered with by the state.

Shit man. I don't agree with those things. Those are good enough reasons not to appoint the guy. A group of think tanks determined that he is, on most major issues either the most, or the second most conservative judge in the federal judiciary. That's great if you agree with his politics. But it's not great if you think that we ought have balanced people on the Court who aren't defined by their drivenness toward an ideology.

Of course there will be conservative and liberal justices. No one can be perfectly separated from their politics. But usually we don't go after justices because they're the most liberal people or the most conservative people that we can find. Being the most conservative or liberal federal judge should be looked at by a reasonable person as good cause for making sure someone doesn't get to sit on the supreme court. They're lifetime appointments, they get the final say on interpretations of the law. We should take seriously the idea of filling the court with reasonable people who are at least capable of feigning some ability to be objective and consistent in their interpretations and we should be frightened by the idea that it might end up staffed with agenda driven ideologues who by their own peers have been deemed to have radical views on issues that they'll be making decisions about.

This is a true pinnacle.
Pluto turns direct in this moment directly on Kavanaughs Juno, he represents a truth about the US that wants to be spoken.
A truth about sex, which is a fundamental modality of organic power. Politics can afford to be relatively honest about it, look at Rome.

You can see all of the feminine left coming back to its source. Here they feel truth, here they radiate it.
All things non sexual derived from this tender rawness in a systemic, intellectual political spectrum are malefic, de-dimensionalizing. But the sexual issue itself, sex as violence, this is something we need to address anew in this age.

It has been the case that women did not understand the power they have taken upon themselves yet, so they suffer it. Men still often controlled what they do with that power. I take it this is one step in women becoming more aware of the leverage they will always have on nature.

Male or female, a victims pain is only a communicable truth in its giving form, the overcoming soul. I can not, I ve tried the past few minutes, speak to what a woman is when she overcomes the traumatic function of having been sexually violated, it is a great thing, an flaming butterfly or some such I see, and it will reign like the Empress Venus. The next two thousand years are this process I reckon, the path marked by the sporadic and then regular and then consistent disclosing of this fire-butterfly which no man can jump high enough to contest. That overcoming is the untouchable supremacy of Venus, the sap in the veins of the spring.

Men can only be overcome by giving them what they hunted after for a hundred million years so as not to suffer from extending that gift; many young females learning this now, and so men are indeed being pacified. Drake epitomizes this in a depressing sense. I do in another, at first glance more embarrassing sense, but in the long term a more self-enjoying one; I accept the beautiful young female as "god", untouchable except through grace, as the Troubadours did; if our aim is to impregnate the world with meaning, then a woman is the best way to go about it. It enhances the joy of conquest immensely, my wolves taught me. If woman is god, then you can have a god adore you. This is how true power will become.

Lastly, sexual violence in both sexes is the blind negation of the interpretation of oneself given by others. Why humans fuck like madmen compared to animals without an opinion of themselves.

I realize Ford is everything that was lacking, causing pain. The lack of a truly feminine figure with leverage.
Trump is good enough with women that he can handle this, but many republicans can not; this will further purify the landscape.

Ford, I like the name. Ford and Trump. Things are making sense.

he should bring her into his cabinet as some kind of sexual violence advisor or something

and since she is not crazy, but was misused by the evil democrats, i think he should respect her testimony and pick a new supreme court justice. this would not cause him to lose approval. only the nazis would get mad, so good. fuck the nazis. and fuck the nazi in the hearts of people like styx and limbaugh and hannity who otherwise can do good and be decent people except when their inner heil hitler comes out.

not to pull the hitler card, lol. but still. all these conservatives lying pretending they don’t see that Ford is way more sane and real than Kavanaugh is. their reckoning is coming for disregarding reality. trump is not going to, he is already looking carefully for the right road here.

Yes, I was thinking exactly the same. A secretary of sexual matters I was writing but erased it. Maybe a sign it could happen.
Trump is a businessman with a delicate daughter, he was quick to see which way not to go, and theres a good chance he will want to use it to make America great again.

Yes fuck styx and them when it comes to real human pain.

I wonder about Fords general ideas on policy.

I don't think she'll want to dedicate her life to what was done to her necessarily, and the appeal she has is something else, it's her sense of purpose and sanity. I have no idea if she's interested in going into politics, thats great about how she did it. There was no ambition in her victimhood.

I lashed out against Ford as a first impulse when I heard about it, but thats normal when an accuser is thrown on the political stage like that - you're like nor another one of these freak shows - I don't feel too guilty about saying some mean shit before I heard them both speak. But it does show how much needed this was for me.

Yes, me too.

Many false accusations by liars and evil people looking to burn good men. But in this case, this is why we take time and allow things to play out.

I have hope that Trump knows the reality. But the evil left must be called out for what they did to this woman. The evil left and the evil right.... Trump stands against both.

Yes, this is another vast advantage of Trump, he isnt desperate for anything. He can't lose if he just follows his impulses. He feels lies are only useful in the short term to distract a liar. Not to build anything.

Look at this, Fords chart.


[mirror - https://i.imgur.com/FOlYtQ0.png ]

Thats very pure. She shares the violent gathering Pluto Uranus Mars in Virgo with Kavanaugh (below), but her Saturn and Chiron have joined to directly oppose it. turn-Chiron is a racially conscientious disclosure, the inventor of LSD had it. Opposed these brutal forces of war Pluto, Uranus, Mars, this fits with her power to cleave society to expose its very minerals with crystalline clarity.

Moon in Gemini (keen) in opposition to Sun in Sagittarius both trining and reciprocating Jupiter in Leo (reciprocity between Sun, ruler of Leo, and Jupiter, ruler of Sagittarius) and Venus thrown in the middle of it.

Her south node is on Mercury in Scorpio, she has deep resources as a detective like thinker and I challenged to bring her secrets to the value-disclosing light of Taurus.

So compare it to Kavanaughs chart, much less of a whole.



The massive pileup in Aquarius is pretty interesting. Id take this as an announcement of the type of situation that is to dominate politics from the midterms of 2022 onward.

Trumps image is something he uses as a lightning rod, while he makes his decisions in a mindset completely unrelated to that image. He is a Gemini, I think a Gemini is too aware of illusion to ever attempt to show a "true face". All other signs are less skeptical of themselves, and thus also of others.

Blasey has Moon in Gemini, Trump Sun in Gemini.
But both have full moons, so Trumps Moon is in Sagittarius, and Fords Sun is there.
Which corroborates what we said before, that Ford is the feminine counterpart to Trumps honestly.

let me take a noob stab at his.



his moon and sun are directly opposite and trining (?) (making a triangle with?) a point in Libra which is balance and scales, justice, and which coincides with Neptune (youthful psychic receptive, illusions, dreams) which therefore balances the sun and moon as justice in the form of youthful dreaming. master of illusions in dual powers of sun and moon.

his ascendant also trines with sun and moon, perfectly between Leo and Virgo so combining “Strengths: Creative, passionate, generous, warm-hearted, cheerful, humorous; Weaknesses: Arrogant, stubborn, self-centered, lazy, inflexible” (Leo) and “Strengths: Loyal, analytical, kind, hardworking, practical; Weaknesses: Shyness, worry, overly critical of self and others, all work and no play” (Virgo) as this is the ascendant so becomes the outward image of his personality split down those lines perfectly, and balanced sun and moon.

mars pluto venus saturn and mercury lined up spaced out almost perfectly in a line between sun and ascendant, like spokes in a wheel grinding across Leo, Cancer and Gemini. like a ladder from AC to sun. then jupiter and neptune sharing Libra with:

17.0075 - 5.014166666... = 11.99333333...

^ distance between them.

11.9933333... / 360 = 3.33% of the full circle. so this distance of jupiter from neptune makes a nice 3 and a third substance of the full wheel and places it exactly mirroring saturn and mercury around the ascendant, with the saturn and mercury substance in cancer as a distance apart equal to:

23.81666 - 8.8666 = 14.915

what is that ratio?

11.9933 / 14.915 = .80 or 4/5

and 14.915 / 360 = 2983/72000

that’s 1111 / a huge 9

omg

11/9, his first day after being elected. and reversing 9/11.

Wow, very insightful. I like that ladder.
Cool notions on Neptune!


On nomenclature, the 120 degrees is a trine, 60 degrees a sextile. Let me list the main used aspects

0 degrees conjunction
30 degrees semisextile
45 degrees semisquare
60 degrees sextile
90 degrees square
120 degrees trine
180 degrees opposition

then 75, 135, 165,
but of course thats just names, your numerical approach is far more exact.

that’s good info, thanks.

do the angles for those need to be exact or how close do they need to be to be considered accurate? i would imagine it’s a continuum as the closer to exact an angle is the more energy flows along the angle.


trump chart reading theme music:

and then,