The Analytic Impossibility of Globalism Until Value Ontology Is Implemented as All-Law (2)

It failed because of self valuing logic.
As I predicted.

For me these are joyful times. I long knew our society was deeply perverse, it was, for me who sees into the hearts of dark things instantly and without wanting to, much worse than this. But it had a veneer of normalcy.


The fact that you can witness it breaking down now, that you can see how logic is their enemy so clearly, this they never intended.


My further predictions will come true as well.
No one escapes the solar logos, as expressed in astrology.

The leadership in control until recently had held that control for a whole Aeon, since Constantine. Hypocrisy bred into power for nearly two thousand years. That takes time to get rid off, it will put up a fight to the death, because if it doesn't it will also die.

But it has been cracking since Nietzsche.

yes however the institutions remain. all of the leftist globalist institutions are not going away. people are still electing openly socialist politicians. elections are also stolen, borders are still basically open, and the ideology is getting even worse and is still very pervasive in and as the mainstream norms of culture and business.

now with the house gone, no good laws will be passed in the next 2 years. so it’s stalled. then in 2020 there will be even more propaganda, election rigging, etc. See, i want to be optimistic like you are but i cannot discount the people i see; they have sold their minds. it is now actually trend to be a slave AND THIS IS MAINSTREAM.

like i said elsewhere here, the only thing we could really do is replace the MSM with real journalism. that is simply necessary. so long as MSM exists it creates the dominant norms and baseline of culture and discussion, it literally creates society. it doesn’t matter if no one believes it (although many still do believe it), look at 1984 for example, no one in that society believes the tovernmen propaganda and fake news but this doesn’t matter, if still controls the dominant social discussion and what is considered acceptable and correct. it is fictionally effective as a known lie.

plus, the people now accept constant surveillance. notice there is no cover for your smart phone camera. no one cares. or they care and just accept it passively, like slaves. because that is what MOST people are today. slaves. and trump and all the rest is good but temporary, the main thing is that people can learn they are in a slave system and this fact won’t actually change the slave system itself. that’s the hidden aspect here. we on the side of truth tend to assume that exposing the evil will negate it - that’s not how it works.

as far as i know, trump hasn’t stopped the globalist state spying apparatus, in fact it was trump that green lighted the fact that everything we do online can be recorded and sold by the IPS’s. i’ve never heard a conservative talk about this uncomfortable fact. it’s like those on the right conveniently close heir eyes to why is painful for them to see on their own side. which deliberate denial is just another form of double think.

we actually have constant monitoring now, we have double think on both sides, we have news speak and crime stop and all the rest Orwell wrote about. trump doesn’t negate this; he makes a space for breathing room, and a possibility of change. but the number one thing preventing change on a larger scale is the MSM. i believe this is the single necessary issue. MSM is THE problem. just imagine if we had fair and honest MSM that was real journalists on the side of truth, reporting to the world what is real and important. just think about what that would look like, and youll begin to see how far we have fallen and how seemingly impossible it is to get out of it until we replace MSM fake news with real journalism by, for and of the people.

the globalists were very clever. they waited patiently until they had total control of mass media, then they really started to push their agenda. it’s like that supposed quote attributed to rockefeller or rothschild i can’t recall which one, about how their plans could never have come to fruition without the air of the media corporations. and it’s very true.

as long as these MSM fake news giants continue to exist, there is no hope.

Well but Ive known all this since I was 3.
It hasn't gotten any worse, it was always completely insane and inhuman.
Trump is simply the first one to resist it, and this brings out all the puss from the wounds that is mainstream society.

Nietzsche was perfectly right about all these things. I find him much more clarifying than 1984. He predicted, saw the inevitability of a pliable mass of "educated" people who do the bidding of a few powerful families. This has constantly been the case in my life, until I developed VO and faces along with me forged a greater paradigm.

Which will take a thousand years to unfold, of course.

Regarding surveillance, this was already the (annoying) case, any hacker can hack into anyones smartphone and anyone can legally track anyone's phone location. If you want to be unsurveilled obviously to get a smartphone isn't smart. Obviously there are cameras in all flatscreens, this is widely known. There is no laptop or tv or computer monitor less than 5 years old that doesn't transmit all that is in its scope, video and audio and probably other information as well. No political leader can do anything about this, this goes right between the agencies and the industries.

This agency-industry link is what was almost completely conquered the world in 2014. But it failed. Then in 2016 it failed even worse.
You say the progress is temporary, but I say it has shown that evil isn't permanent. That for me is the gain. Not that now suddenly all is a-okay, or will be anytime soon, but that certain groups who were certain of victory, which would have absolutely meant nuclear war as was likely intended, were overruled by, basically, me and my people. By overt self-valuing logic.

It was far, far worse in the 90s. Then, the liberals could just bomb a European capital with impunity. Back then their machine was flawless. Now, it is clearly not. They need far more means to keep people in check and they aren't nearly as free in starting wars.

What they are pulling now is extreme measures, required to not lose very quickly.

I had no hope of the Reps holding on the the House, by the way. I am just glad they held on the the Senate, meaning civil war can be averted for a while.
But clearly everything is moving EXACTLY as I predicted. Meaning - well, I done predicted it plenty of times, no sense in repeating it. It will happen.

In Amsterdam life has already started changing back to more human forms.
A few years ago this was simply a stronghold of the stupidest people you could possibly imagine, the language you heard on the street was quite literally only grunting, and where a sentence was managed, it was guaranteed to be incorrect. Immigrants never get Dutch grammar right, always use the wrong pronouns and stuff when they stop grunting and try to sound educated. But now, Dutch people are also talking again, and they sound ... pretty normal. Compared to what one heard in the streets and stores in the past decade, they sound like geniuses.

Uhhummelehummeleuuhh ehh gegegege.... ehh hummmelehummele... that was about the extent of conversation at the peak of liberal rule here. Now you only hear that sort of thing when you're not intended to hear it. The folks aren't as proud of their illiteracy anymore. That is deadly for them, as it is all they have.

In 1999, when I had my first gsm, the old metal cased Nokia 3210 with the game "snake" on it, I already explained to my dad how in ten years phones would have cameras and internet and basically everything a computer can have. Obviously I knew also that this meant total access of these manufacturers to private lives. Who manufactures such a perfect spying machine without intending to sell contracts to spying agencies? No one, thats not how the world works.

Then when Samsung, which is all military, came into the market with their android phones and big tv screens, I knew with certainty that my predictions had come true. I was just impressed, not scared of it, as where I come from, the reality Im from, is Auschwitz. As bad as it is now, it certainly isn't as bad as Hitlers overt rule, which would have come to pass again under HRC.

The only point I was scared was when the Nato seemed to have killed Putin. That would have meant the whole world would be turned into a concentration camp. That was the turning point, when that plan failed.

Yes, they'll always try to make the world into a prison camp. But the setbacks they've had are unfathomably expensive for them and set them back so much that they might already have been broken, despite the appearances they so successfully project of being in control of everything.

They were in flawless control for decades, when everyone went about their lives as if the world was normal.

I was never under the impression that I could own a machine with a camera in it and electronic send and receive powers, and not be spied on. That just seems like 1+1=a koala bear.
Obviously, smartphones are Trojan horses.
The question is, what can powers do with the information? Thats a battlefield for the coming 1000 years.

What I suspect might have happened with some of my information is that it is given to Netflix for storylines. I think that happens a lot, that agencies come to Netflix or Warner and just give then a synopsis they derived from some people they spied on. Granted thats eerie as fuck. On the other hand, what I write here on BTL is meant to be taken by anonymous lurkers. I write here for the emerging global mind, which will be for a large part electronic, with all sorts of serfs working in agencies to keep some sort of grasp on it.

Humanity is just coming into puberty. All will be messy for a long, long time.

One is either fully with oneself and ones clan now, or with them.
They harvest everyone who doesn't have absolute loyalties to his own.

The challenge nature has set us evidently is that we become armoured in the ways we share information. We need to share info only in terms that serve our interests. Thats always smart, but the samsung paradigm (Apple, of course completely dominating in this paradigm, is the founder of an older, meta paradigm, since they invented the graphic interface) forces this on us. We will become more secretive and cunning, as well as more accomplished in projection - our days of naively going about speaking without consequences are over; all our words have an impact on the Sphere (the whole of the online world); meaning anyone who wishes to appear silent while speaking is lost to fear and failure, whereas those who deliberately speak in the power of self-valuing to imprint the nature of this power on the Sphere can not fail to imprint his will "on millennia as on wax" to speak with the old lad, he can not fail the aristocracy of the poetic form the world will always attain on the crests of the most tumultuous storms, and reify itself there - the world "as a whole" with all its wars is clearly less than zero sum, this is why it always reaches beyond itself. But soon the world will no longer be understood as a whole, and it will be more than a zero-sum world.

The wholeness of the world is the primordial violence out of which the universe is supposed to have been born, the Big Bangs parent being the singularity, in which all is concentrated in one so that it is perfect. This notion is really a mask for the primordial chaos of drives, with Schelling. Our globalism is a terrifying mask of the irrevocable contrasts of Asia to America, Europe to Africa, etc; the UN is the uncanny acknowledgement of this irrevocable conflict. It does not represent any other consensus than that the world is indeed terrible, and the perpetuation of malice under the guise of a conscience. That perhaps sometimes it rises to be more than that, even if only once or twice, signifies that it can be taken under moral control. There is after all a permanent counsel of few and old enough countries that it isn't necessarily doomed to be a stalemate between a host of players all too many of whom have petty ethical repertoires.

I believe in the institutions, like I believe in the existence of tools. I believe that they exist and can be used to power thus are stable self-valuings. By being valued they are able to set the terms of their existence into our world. Ive always thought of the world before Trump as a harvester machine withut a pilot. Trump is really a guy that ran into the field and jumped hazardously onto the rolling tire and into the cabin and began to work the levers and exert control. I said for years that this needed to be done even before VO. So now there isn't just a few philosophic tyrants who understand, it is also the world itself as it trembles before its own power.

Very important to tie this all together with what we discussed asbout separate species within mankind. The species of slaves is sifting now at its peak, those who have made their astronomic numbers of millions on its juices are now having to take a risk either way. It is clear that the old plans aren't as flawless as thought. It is clear that there is a disadvantage to being deluded, and thus also to having armies of deluded people, in comparison to not being deluded and having armies of not deluded people.

The first necessity in maintaining the formation of an army of deluded people is to keep screaming delusional messages at them so loud that they can not hear anything else. This not only costs much energy but it also prevents the screamers from understanding what is really going on - stare too long into the abyss  - or the uncertainty principle, they can't exist in power at the same time as exerting masses into submission. Their effort becomes them and the effort also defines their victims so they become the same waveform as their victims and which is a risk they're facing, considering non delusionals have an estimated two standard deviations in superior IQ and just about equal numbers. Only the wealth separates them from us - so nature has arranged a long trajectory of them spending yuge amounts of that on deluding people, which will be the ugliest spectacle ever to take place on earth, and then its over. One day it'll just stop. This is a fever, and all kinds of myths and nightmarish visions come true in a feverspell.

A fever is like losing your shield to the Sun. It drives people to the utmost despair, and people who are living in towns hide despair as best as they can, they only express it in violence to what they see as sanctioned bad guys, like in war. It is war now. People are at 110 degree temperatures and just running around mindlessly as best they can. Im not impressed by them as much as I was under Obama. Then they didn't know they were sick yet. Now that delusion was impressive. Now they know damn well they are sick. Just tell them that, you're sick buddy, and you know it. And then walk away. And when they laugh hear how it turns bitter. There is no joy to their conquest. You see damn well that they don't know what to do with the House. It only gives the added problem of an imminent leadership crisis.

my default position is not yours, when it comes to spying. i see no reason why devices cannot be made without intrinsic spying aspects. in fact, in a free economy where the people tend not to want to be spied on, devices made without spying would be much more successful and make trillions more dollars than devices made to spy. but this gets back to the media, as i was saying how the MSM is the number one enemy and lynchpin in the globalist system. a free independent media would expose spying on devices, therefore making such devices not lucrative to produce.

unfortunately the media does the exact opposite and would never run a story on how google or whatever else spies on you.

maybe it’s different in Europe, but in the US we have a constitutional right to be protected from unlawful search and seizure, which has been interpreted also as a right to privacy. that’s why you need a judge to OK spying on a citizen. so no, i do not accept that it is somehow obvious or inevitable or normal or whatever else that technology would be used to spy on everyone all the time. it’s not hard at all to make technology that ISNT used for such purposes, that’s how all these technologies start. they are, however, eventually taken over by tyrants, military and secret cabals. of course some of the tech is seed funded with this in mind from the start, but that also doesn’t need to be the case, and to my earlier point a free media would report such things so the people would become aware of it.

the level of careful secrecy involved in managing the kind of plots going on today would be absolutely untenable in a world with free and independent media. but in a world with the fake news MSM globalist complex, it takes very little effort at all.

the takeover of the media has been slow and deliberate. it was carefully orchestrated. it didn’t need to be this way. it’s not inevitable as you seem to think. but the fact that it exists does make something inevitable, namely that someone like trump cannot do enough to save us. at best, and this is my more depressing view but i see no way around it, trump is basically achieving a stability in the system so it can continue to propagate itself. conservatives and capitalists are always brought in, hated, resisted, but used to actually make things work and run effectively. no leftist can run something for very long. trump is basically propping up the globalist system, probably without realizing it. but if he really wants to do good then he could have (back when he had congress) broken up media and tech monopolies, ended ISP spying, disclosed and ended NSA spying programs, and cancelled the federal reserve. he could actually have done shit like that. not saying it’s easy but he doesn’t even talk about it. he could also have privatized many major universities and thus reduced cost of tuition, there are so many good things he could do, but breaking up media and tech monopolies combined with ending and exposing government spying programs including never having signed unrivaled law the ability of ISPs to track and sell everything you do... no, he didn’t do any of that.  and im surprised i’m the only one pointing that out.

The Midterms are simply what we in holland have as the Elections, because we don't have a president.
Everything thats voted for in the US midterms is voted for here on Election Day.

Our Prime Minister is simply the Majority Leader. With us, government is at a fundamental impasse. There is no power-trip, no true responsibility, no Leadership, good or bad; that was stripped from the Monarch and never given to the chief executive. A prime minster can never do what a president can.

I wonder what would happen if this country got a president. The President of the Netherlands. Hmm. I don't know, it sounds like miniature golf.
On the other hand it may be the only way to keep safe in a EU environment. To not have to stall the stalling from the EU commission into the stalling of parties against each other, but to have a man or a woman (in Holland I can see that very well) who can just decide stuff, that would at least be honest.
Maybe the EU could reform into a real system if all countries appointed by direct elections a sole representative to small European Senate, a place where each country has 1 member. No matter the size. This would go against the interests of the larger nations, which is only fair of you want a true Union. You can't have a union where nevertheless the biggest country gets to decide everything.

Defenders of the Earth wrote:

my default position is not yours, when it comes to spying. i see no reason why decided cannot be made without intrinsic spying aspects. in fact, in a free economy where the people tend not to want to be spied on, devices made without spying would be much more successful and make trillions more dollars than devices made to spy. but this gets back to the media, as i was saying how the MSM is the number one enemy and lynchpin in the globalist system. a free independent media would expose spying on devices, therefore making such devices not lucrative to produce.

unfortunately the media does the exact opposite and would never run a story on how google or whatever else spies on you.

maybe it’s different in Europe, but in the US we have a constitutional right to be porte ted from unlawful search and seizure, which has been interpreted also as a right to privacy. that’s why you need a judge to OK spying on a citizen. so no, i do not accept that it is somehow obvious or inevitable or normal or whatever else that technology would be used to spy on everyone all the time. it’s not hard at all to make technology that ISNT used for such purposes, that’s how all these technologies start. they are, however, eventually taken over by tyrants, military and secret cabals. of course some of the tech is seed funded with this in mind from the start, but that also doesn’t need to be the case, and to my earlier point a free media would report such things so the people would become aware of it.

the level of careful secrecy involved in managing the kind of plots going on today would be absolutely untenable in a world with free and independent media. but in a world with the fake news MSM globalist complex, it takes very little effort at all.

the takeover of the media has been slow and deliberate. it was carefully orchestrated. it didn’t need to be this way. it’s not inevitable as you seem to think. but the fact that it exists does make something inevitable, namely that someone like trump cannot do enough to save us. at best, and this is my more depressing view but i see no way around it, trump is basically achieving a stability in the system so it can continue to propagate itself. conservatives and capitalists are always brought in, hated, resisted, but used to actually make things work and run effectively. no leftist can run something for very long. trump is basically propping up the globalist system, probably without realizing it. but if he really wants to do good then he could have (back when he had congress) broken up media and tech monopolies, ended ISP spying, disclosed and ended NSA spring programs, and cancelled the federal reserve. he could actually have done shit like that. not saying it’s easy but he doesn’t even talk about it. he could also have privatized many major universities and thus reduced cost of tuition, there are so many good things he could do, but breaking up media and tech monopolies combined with ending and exposing government spying programs including never having signed unrivaled law the ability of ISPs to track and sell everything you do... no, he didn’t do any of that.  and im surprised i’m the only one pointing that out.

I don't think its reasonable to say it wasn't inevitable, since it has happened with no resistance at all, and I was predicting it from within - remember I was working in media this whole time. Like I said it was already inevitable when I was 3. Or lets say, at 6 I knew the TV and the Paper were God and a every savage one. A god who only wanted stupidity, fakness, terror and death. And then there were some cool things on it now and then too, like Transformers. But Ive not seen any increase in the slavishness of people before bad ideas, I only see that bad ideas found some resistance exactly when I predicted it would.

I think in terms of thousands of years plus I don't have the illusion that the political world will ever not be will to power in the most savage sense.

I can tell you why these rights to privacy don't apply to reality - simply because they can't be guaranteed.
Its just not feasible. If you break up the tech and media monopolies the markets will crash beyond any precedent and you will get ridiculous inflation and all alliances will be broken and no one will believe in it etc - the power of Trump is rather that in the face of the shitblizzard he keeps facing forward and shuffling in the right direction. This, this image of bravery, of pure will to stay cool in the face of total insanity, this is what I recognize as the sign that the days of the self-evidently true lie are coming to an end.

In as far as the spying comes through the devices we buy, there is no legal way we can be protected, because we smily sign the waiver to forfeit privacy by using it unless there is an explicit warranty with money back guarantee from the manufacturer that the product can not be used for spying. The government could demand this, but then all other governments in the world would have an advantage. I see tech as its own will to power, I don't mind that it expands, as I don't see humanity as nearly strong or smart enough to ever really control what it leads to. Trumps election by means of the organs whose owners paid billions to stop him is of course case in point. Clearly the tech is very okay with this, even though its wielders aren't.

Technology may fly anywhere but will always land on the side of truth, because in the final analysis it absolutely requires it for its construction.

I don't think a president can simply go about doing these things, I think the assassination of the ones who tried has taught us as much. It is still a balancing act. That is the beauty of its design, I suppose.

And if anyone is about to straight out break into the power of the Fed and a number of private multi trillion interests, it is not likely to be a businessman.
I think what Trump is concerned with is the first fundamental step to get anything honest done at all; speak the truth, and speak the most basic truths.

People want to be safe in their own country. This is the primordial right he has granted mankind. It had been taken from us completely and utterly but now it is back. And so he has done a few other remarkable things where fundamental goods were restored. But the thing I simply had not derived from the evil that was taking place always and everywhere, but only from VO, is Trump.

There is no way technology is going to be less powerful than it can easily be.

We are all of us online being self-valued by the possibility of the Sphere.
Literally all activity online is invaluable to it. It just ... exists. This is how the future discloses the present.

By the way I have had a concept for an interface for this Sphere since 2006.

All security protocols now are simply grain on the mills of the Sphere. All coding is sold for completely different reasons than what ultimately takes hold of it as its essence;



thought.

(power, truth, disclosure)

In terms of the currently existing types of looping integrities of codes, I would say there is probably nothing less significant to it than the human purpose it was made to fulfill.

Every single problem that a coder solved or made worse and every architectural success as well as flaw is grain on the mill of the Sphere.

I give Trump credit for not starting anything he can't control. Unlike any other active president.

But say that he would do these things you would like him to, can you describe the chain of events you expect to take place?

I do not see how one can dismantle private media corporations that sell to willing customers unless you are willing to engage in Communism yourself.

People have a right to lie. Thats American. They have the right to scam people into literally buying the lie.
This is a very difficult challenge the Founding Fathers themselves have set for us.
It is one that is implicit in the Constitution, one that will teach us at last to act in word as well as in deed with conscience. But only at last, not quite yet.

Hell, its by no means time yet.

Back to the earlier point about Intelligence and its evolution.

Making humans less apt at processing information is going to create an environment of little resilience to developing code from foreign powers.
Like the saying now goes around about Russia that you can't find a guy in its borders who isn't a coder. This is what Putin unquestionably drilled into all the channels of implicit communication; get in control of this field before the Amerikanskis do. It is where the money is at. Now Russia is a sophisticated developer of all kinds of categorically potentiating stuff in electronic intelligence. So now a corrupt genocidal cunt can't get elected in the US because her files just aren't safe, the truth will get out. This is the deeper reality of our digital surveillance state; its not only we who share information.

I guess the wait is on a hack of the IRS!!

Hahaha

no lets not, comrades. Stay home. Sit.

Dumb humans aren't going to be selfvaluing as the dominant species.

Yet of course a man from Japan said that all men in the deepest of hearts long for the end of the world. This also is true.

Hail Philosophy therefore -
only it is captain of its own soul (=fate).

It is in part due to my astrological meta-view on human affairs that I do not see mans intentions as the agent in much of what he brings about. I just see him gather in different forms of will to power, adoring different truths as ultimate values, and becoming more and more crafty as he goes along, and in some ages, man awakens to a sublime state and actually makes his own fate. Of course I want that. The 60s were all kinds of meh.

But I don't think privacy of communications is going to be as interesting as relevance in communications. For most people privacy is a guarantee by them being completely pointless, useless for mining. Sure they'll get the commercials for the things they just thought about, but they won't be noticed by anything with an intention beyond sales.

Wherever this is not the case, whenever someones mind is mined, that someone has power over this world. Like gold, when it is mined from the rock, it acquires its power over the world. The miners and salesmen and owners are its servants, the owner the butler who upholds it to be beheld. The kings of old were the thrones of gold.

My whole life I used to believe things were inevitably going to get fucked unless someone figured out something real and do it fast.
When I had VO this attitude changed, I had figured something out and I was going to work at it day and night. And I did and then this all came about, and eventually Trump turned out to have figured out the same sort of thing for where it was necessary in politics, and I felt more vindicated than Id ever anticipated, so it would really be impossible for me to feel like the machine is taking over again, I simply don't believe in it anymore. Because Ive now seen more than once that the game can be won if you dont bet on money but on the game.