Trump World

I agree. Merkel and her type are indeed worse than Hitler. Much worse. Which is saying something, because Hitler was a real shithead too of course.

When you have Zuckerberg helping foreign nations identify thought criminals through their Facebook posts, so those people can then be executed, and no media or politician says anything about it, we know things are very bad.

The people of Europe are going to be wiped out. Russia will eventually reform alliances with Eastern European nations, which will survive the death of western and norther Europe. Italy and a couple others might survive, but not without a bloody civil war first. Europe is going to look very different in 50 years.

Thrasymachus wrote:

I agree. Merkel and her type are indeed worse than Hitler. Much worse. Which is saying something, because Hitler was a real shithead too of course.

Lol. Quite.
But Hitler had some actual reasons, like the fact that Germany was on the verge of being disintegrated and divided up between other European powers. His aim was only to make Germany world power. It wasn't to eradicate all of nature and love out of humanity. This is Merkels aim. She is indeed far worse than Hitler, as are her main allies. Just evil a century advanced.

Quote :

When you have Zuckerberg helping foreign nations identify thought criminals through their Facebook posts, so those people can then be executed, and no media or politician says anything about it, we know things are very bad.

Yes, especially since all the people save maybe 3 percent are either gladly complying, or actively smearing and slandering those that arent. The cafes of western Europe are jam packed with the scum of the Earth, all self congratulating on how they are tolerating all sorts of unimaginable torture in the name of their iphone, the thing they have instead of entity.

I wonder what civil war looks like on Instagram.

Quote :

The people of Europe are going to be wiped out. Russia will eventually reform alliances with Eastern European nations, which will survive the death of western and norther Europe. Italy and a couple others might survive, but not without a bloody civil war first. Europe is going to look very different in 50 years.

I cant quite see it happen yet, Im peering through the mist of probabilities. Its so sludgy. N/W Europeans are so reactionless, theyre barely even there. Theyre already deader than any Auschwitz victim, so Soros wont have to kill them in order to make our traditions disappear. He can just broadcast more dwdd and hipsters will continue to get their haircuts, and life will keep seeping away.

Maybe in 50 years Holland will just be one giant overtaxed bazaar where all the plebs scuffles hunched over a screen trying out feminist burkas, as a foundation for a taxhaven for friends of Soros. That could happen, that the Dutch will simply not resist, and manage to do to all dissenters what my cousins did to me, as zealous slaves tend to do to their family for their masters.

Here's what I now think happened in England:

Brexit vote -
some double agent tells May to call for new elections
they set off a terrorist attacks, to rile up May and have her err
they get the Socialists a lot of positive coverage and print the most unflattering shots of May every day on all front pages they control, so they get a deadlocked parliament, and then they get Germany and France to soften their tone and make overtures for Britain remaining in the EU.
No idea if it will play out entirely according to their plan, but certain is that Britain will not be capable of decisively acting in its own interests for the foreseeable future.

All of this scheming and power-games is silly nonsense, it's so utterly boring to any seriously existing entity. Try to imagine a healthy, mentally agile, intelligent, courageous woman looking at these sort of political games and wonder how she would react. She might feel some revulsion, but mostly she would laugh light and ask why men are so utterly low entities that their aspirations come to nothing but the most banal and boring tripe of trying to secretly steer nations toward their own ends of being personally "in charge". It's not even petty, it doesn't even rise to that standard. Termites with an ability to read and speak would be doing just about the exact same thing that the "elite" political classes and cabal groups have been doing for a century or more now.

It's just impossible to respect any of it. Truth is a woman, as N said, and she can't even bemoan this termite stuff that comprises the "best" of educated, political leadership in humanity today, can't even get upset about it; how do you get upset at a mount of termites doing crawly scummy termite things? You might get a small laugh at their utter non-entity-ness, a moment before you clear out the nest.

N meant that derisively, in that truth is fickle and opportune.

I don't practice generalization of phenomena like this myself, it complicates things, never seems to resolve much.

In my life it have been mainly women that advocated Marxist philosophy and mainly men that tried to remain noble but were systematically driven into the ground, trying to please these women.

Note that the worst and most wretched politicians of this age, Merkel and Clont, are both female. I think evil can only go so far under men - when the world needs to be entirely destroyed, literally blown to pieces, women are required. Ive noticed women are infinitely more vengeful and reckless than men.

To me this all calls for men to rise up, to defeat this fickle 'truth', to become true.
I mean not simply males, but those rare males that manage to grow up despite their infantile culture.

Women can only govern as ideals, as judges, as guidance. Executive power becomes infinitely more remorseless under women. If the day comes that women take a gender based control of politics, I am certain this will result in the quest for the extermination of the male gender, and sexless reproduction.

This may indeed be what we're heading for in some millions of years, as a form of exhaustion - the dynamic chain of fusion that is mankind would collapse into a neutered body, a neutron star.

Merkhell and Clont are infinitely more "male" than they could ever hope to be female.

And I do not agree that N meant truth is fickle. He meant something infinitely higher with that particular simile.

The cabal-driven world we are heading into is particularly "male", the dead neutron star. Women qua women have nothing to do with it.

Read Confessions of an Economic Hitman and you will see how "women" beholden to the cabal powers seduce young men in service to the cause. They use sex as a bait and weapon. These are not real women, they are nothing more than Clonts in hot bodies.

Thrasymachus wrote:

Merkhell and Clont are infinitely more "male" than they could ever hope to be female.

Really?
Male to me simply means to have a penis, etc, a biological definition.

These women are to me entirely female, with no male strengths, hardly any female strengths, but a lot of magnetic self-loathing/sickness. Their anti-gender politics are not male or masculine at all. Further removed from male/masculine than any healthy woman.

Thrasymachus wrote:

Read Confessions of an Economic Hitman and you will see how "women" beholden to the cabal powers seduce young men in service to the cause. They use sex as a bait and weapon. These are not real women, they are nothing more than Clonts in hot bodies.

I think that's actually an archetype female function.
The Muse and the whore - both of whom I respect far more than the politician.

^ if you think that is female then I don't know what to do for you.

Nature seduces itself to itself.

Some women seduce men to lofty causes, others to ignoble ones, but woman will always seduce this or that way.

Murlk seduces the sick to infect the strong. Clont seduces to terminally sick to annihilate us all and end the suffering.

If you think that is a male....

Merkhell and Clont are women emulating male values, which always ends..... very ugly. And it is "men" (globalist fraternal orders) who push this image of value.

No real man would ever follow such things. Hence why they also employ hordes of prostitues to sweeten the deal.

I repeat, I have never had any reason to deviate from biological definitions. I do not see gender as subservient to ideals, ethics or even aesthetics.
I relate strongly to the irony in this video. I dont know or associate with Glenn Beck, hes not in the video.

http://www.glennbeck.com/2017/06/09/matt-walsh-science-is-so-bigoted/

Merkel is simply some of the worst the female gender has to offer. The worst the male gender has to offer thrives in the Middle East and increasingly in the West.
The best the female gender has to offer is a matter of taste, we'll lean in different directions but both directly away from Merkel.
In terms of the ideal male, that is of course the philosopher-king.

I absolutely disagree that Clont and Murkls values are male or masculine. The same goes for their methods.

To me male and female are both entirely positive and irreversible.
A female can be a very poor form of a female, likewise with males.

Extraordinary poorness of constitution results, and that is what Nietzsche is basically only about, in morality that subverts nature, that wills death. It is just tiredness we see in the face of Murlk, a genetic line that only wishes to die off, but the human spirit always wishes to conquer; so Murlkl conquers in having Europe die off, and finally herself.
She will rest in peace - rest, death is all she is after - but so much so that her individual death couldn't suffice.

I would like to emphasize my ideas on what the genders constitute. Opaqueness and non definiteness of gender has been what I grew up with as an ethics, and it has been the most damaging thing in my life by far. My entire soul is now oriented on gender specific, gender natural, and gender ideal 'politics' - in the sense of the human as a "Polis of drives".

The ideal male as I might judge my own gender would be a trinity of philosopher, warrior, and cultivator.
Without the warrior element the female he attracts will be less of a daring creature herself. Without the philosopher, she can be any girl whatsoever. Without the cultivator, there can't be much of a romance or family.
Discernment, strength and fertility.

In the woman, these are; muse, warrior and cultivator.
Only the most spiritual part is different from the man, as it is in spirit that the sexes differentiate best - sex is of course an intensely spiritual experience.
it transcends all practicality but subsumes it with vigor.

Warrior and cultivator are the basic human functions; creation is always a result of destruction, be it of atoms in the sun of cells in the blood or any kind of katabolic plasma. A warrior is marked by physical discipline, meaning being accustomed to quick breakdown and buildup of musculature, and quick regeneration in general. It is easy to see how this is a natural ideal, that simply always will be an ideal, because it is the purest becoming a human can attain.

The muse is what inspires the philosopher, and the artist, and the warrior, and any form of proper male to greatness. In her mind and in her well placed words the muse is equal to the philosopher - but she isnt him and she absolutely does not want to be.
Ive seen this, in all the true loves of my life, as well as in those noble loves of my true friends that I know -
the woman refuses to philosophize as a discipline - her discipline is to exalt those rare men that deserve her presence, which is a sensuous thing even by virtue of her infinitely fine mind.

I think that humanity in terms of truth is a line that wants, not "to conquer", but to get to the truth. And yes Glenn Beck is garbage.

The whole pant suit phenomenon that surrounded Shillery is a clue into her mind. These "women" are not really women at all because they have values supposedly male virtues of objectivity and power-strength. Clont is just the shadow image of Bill, I don't know what Murk is a shadow image of but you can be sure it is some male elitist (a Macron type bitch-boy for sure). Most women reject feminism because it isn't really feminine at all, which is obvious.

Men want "hot pussy" and the globalists are happy to deliver. But their "female" leaders are so non-feminine it is crazy. I wonder why? Why is Ann Coulter or Sarah Palin hates with such voracity by them, why will Lauren Southern never get anything from them but fox piss? There is a reason: they hate actual female virtue.

Theresa May is an example of what happens with somewhat real women in politics -
they are either corrupted or they are thrown down and violated. She suffered a lot of both.
Government function itself, in the executive office, is a function with masculine properties.
That is why only women who can be interpreted as male-ish take office - but it never works because no woman is actually ever male, even ish.
It just means that they are less human, thus less female. Not more male. 1x0 does not get to -1.
Transgenderism is an attempt, but it indeed only arrives at 0, at sexual impotence, as the end of the line.
Again, all of it is a function of the will to death, and a death greater than ones own personal one - these people have not the honor to endure the idea of dying for just their lifes end.
War may be a function simply of immaturity, of the stupidity of not having lived.
'Behind every strong man stands a strong woman' is certainly not true. A woman can stand in front of or next to a strong man, and a strong man can stand alone. But it is true that the type of strength that wholesome women seem to actually enjoy is that of causing a man to go to great lengths to attain his potential.
as banally as that brings us back to sex, that's just how it is. There's nature, and a specifically intense form of it is sexual nature, which is two types entirely different in mutual dependence. A pure dynamism with two very different sets of functions. Entire death to feminism is required, so that there's no need for masculinism either. All these morons on ILP are reactions to feminism - they have too little experience to recognize what is male, what they are.

Yeah, the Dems record in special elections now is 0-5. Even with all the millions of dollars coming in from California. Nice to see that elections can't always be bought.

It's the Trump effect. The only thing that is proven to cancel out the effects of money in politics.

OH SHIT.